Did you know the QUADAS-2 tool, a key quality assessment framework, was last updated in 20111? Even a decade later, it’s still vital for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Today, we explore how QUADAS-2 improves the quality of diagnostic studies.

QUADAS-2 stands for “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2.” It helps researchers and clinicians check the quality of diagnostic studies. This detailed framework looks at four main areas: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each area is checked for bias, with the first three also reviewed for applicability concerns.

Using QUADAS-2 involves a systematic process with four phases. You start by summarizing your review question and tailoring the tool. Then, you create a flow diagram and assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns. This method ensures quality evaluation is consistent and reliable, enhancing clinical decision-making.

Key Takeaways

  • QUADAS-2 is the current version of the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies, updated in 20111
  • The tool consists of four key domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing2
  • QUADAS-2 implementation involves a structured four-phase process to ensure consistent and reliable evaluation of study quality
  • Proper QUADAS-2 implementation is crucial for enhancing the rigor and reliability of diagnostic studies used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  • Ongoing efforts, such as the QUADAS-AI project, aim to further develop and refine quality assessment tools for the evolving landscape of AI-based diagnostic accuracy studies12

Introduction to QUADAS-2 and Its Importance

Quality assessment is key in evidence-based practice. It makes sure studies are reliable and trustworthy. The QUADAS-2 tool3 helps evaluate studies, especially in AI diagnostics4.

What is QUADAS-2?

QUADAS-2 is an updated version of the original QUADAS tool. It tackles the challenges of evaluating diagnostic studies3. It offers a way for experts to check the quality of studies, including AI-driven ones4.

The Role of QUADAS-2 in Diagnostic Studies

QUADAS-2 is vital for judging the quality and usefulness of studies. It’s key for using diagnostic tools, like AI ones, in clinics4. It helps make sure decisions are based on solid evidence3.

Key Benefits of Implementing QUADAS-2

Using QUADAS-2 offers a detailed, standard way to review studies. It spots biases, making findings more reliable. This leads to better care for patients34.

“QUADAS-2 provides a robust and transparent framework for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies, which is essential for informed decision-making in healthcare.”

Overview of the QUADAS-2 Tool

The QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy tool is a key tool for checking the quality of studies on diagnostic accuracy5. It’s an update from QUADAS, focusing more on how well studies apply to real-world situations5.

Components of QUADAS-2

QUADAS-2 looks at four main areas: how patients are chosen, the index test, the reference standard, and how and when things are done5. It uses questions to help researchers spot bias and check if studies fit the review’s needs5.

How QUADAS-2 Differs from Previous Versions

QUADAS-2 is more structured than its predecessor, focusing on how well studies apply to real-world situations5. It also pays more attention to whether studies are relevant to the review question5. Plus, it offers clearer guidance on interpreting questions and making judgments5.

Unpacking the Four Domains of QUADAS-2

The four domains of QUADAS-2 cover different aspects of diagnostic studies5. They help researchers understand the quality and potential biases in studies5.

The patient selection domain looks at bias and applicability in choosing study participants6. The index test domain checks bias and applicability in the test itself6. The reference standard domain evaluates the gold standard’s validity and reliability6. Lastly, the flow and timing domain examines participant flow and timing issues6.

By examining these domains, researchers can understand the quality and potential biases in diagnostic studies56. This leads to more reliable systematic reviews and meta-analyses56.

Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing QUADAS-2

Using the QUADAS-2 tool is a detailed process. It helps check the quality of studies on diagnostic accuracy7. This method makes sure reviews and analyses are thorough and reliable.

Preparing for Assessment

Before starting, researchers need to know the review’s focus7. They should also prepare the tool for the specific study being looked at. This means understanding the study’s main points, like the condition being studied and the tests used.

Conducting the Assessment

The QUADAS-2 tool asks questions in four areas: how patients were chosen, the tests used, the standards for comparison, and the study’s flow and timing7. Based on these answers, researchers can spot any biases or issues with the study’s relevance.

Reporting Results of QUADAS-2 Implementation

The findings of the QUADAS-2 assessment are shown in a special format7. This includes a diagram of how studies were chosen and a table of biases and concerns for each study8. This detailed reporting makes the review or analysis more clear and trustworthy.

Domain Signaling Questions Judgments
Patient Selection
  • Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled?
  • Was a case-control design avoided?
  • Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions?
  • Risk of Bias
  • Concerns regarding Applicability
Index Test
  • Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the reference standard?
  • If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified?
  • Risk of Bias
  • Concerns regarding Applicability
Reference Standard
  • Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition?
  • Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the index test results?
  • Risk of Bias
  • Concerns regarding Applicability
Flow and Timing
  • Was there an appropriate interval between the index test and reference standard?
  • Did all patients receive the same reference standard?
  • Were all patients included in the analysis?
  • Risk of Bias
  • Concerns regarding Applicability

By following this guide, researchers can use the QUADAS-2 tool well. This ensures the quality and trustworthiness of reviews and analyses in diagnostics78.

Domain 1: Patient Selection

Choosing the right patients is key in diagnostic accuracy studies. The QUADAS-2 tool checks how patients are selected. This is important because it affects how valid and useful the study’s results are9.

Importance of Patient Selection in Diagnostics

The QUADAS-2 tool looks at if the patients in the study match the group the test is meant for. It considers things like if patients were tested before, how they were chosen, and where they got their care10. Picking the right patients helps avoid bias and makes the study’s results more reliable.

Common Biases in Patient Selection

  • Consecutive or random sampling: If patients aren’t picked randomly or in order, the sample might not be fair11.
  • Case-control design: Staying away from case-control designs is important. They can make the test seem more accurate than it is11.
  • Inappropriate exclusions: If patients are left out for the wrong reasons, it can skew the study’s results11.

Assessing Patient Selection with QUADAS-2

The QUADAS-2 tool has special questions and factors to check for bias and if the study applies to real-world situations. These checks help spot problems and make sure the study is reliable10. By paying attention to these details, researchers can make their findings more trustworthy and useful. This boosts the methodological quality and bias evaluation of diagnostic accuracy studies.

“Proper patient selection is a cornerstone of diagnostic accuracy studies, as it ensures the relevance and applicability of the study findings to the target population.”

Domain 2: Index Test

In the world of diagnostic accuracy studies, the index test is key. QUADAS-2 checks this area to make sure the test is fair. This improves diagnostic accuracy studies, quality appraisal, and evidence-based practice.

Evaluating the Index Test for Bias

QUADAS-2 looks at if the index test results were fair. It checks if the test results were known before the final decision4. This helps spot and fix any unfairness in the test, making the study results trustworthy.

Case Studies Demonstrating Index Test Assessment

Real-world examples show how QUADAS-2 works in practice10. These examples point out common problems like unfair exclusions and unclear test timing. By learning from these, researchers can improve their work and make studies more reliable.

“The findings of the assessment of risk of bias and applicability play an important role in the systematic review process. Whether a systematic review of test accuracy studies allows conclusions about the accuracy of a test or differences in accuracy between two or more tests, will depend on having available studies at low risk of bias that directly apply to the review question.”4

By carefully checking the index test, QUADAS-2 helps make sure studies are fair and reliable. This helps the healthcare field and improves patient care.

Domain 3: Reference Standard

In the QUADAS-2 framework, the reference standard domain is key. It looks at the test’s validity and reliability for true disease status. Understanding the reference standard is crucial for evaluating diagnostic accuracy4.

Ensuring Validity of the Reference Standard

The QUADAS-2 tool checks if the reference standard correctly classifies the condition. It also checks if the results were interpreted without knowing the index test results10. This is vital because any flaws in the reference standard can affect the index test’s accuracy.

Challenges in Assessing Reference Standards

Finding the right reference standard can be tough. This is especially true when there’s no perfect test or when the standard itself has errors10. Researchers must think carefully about the standard’s reliability and if it fits the diagnostic question.

Also, interpreting the reference standard results can be biased if they depend on personal judgment4.

To overcome these challenges, it’s important to understand diagnostic accuracy studies well. Using tools like QUADAS-2 helps ensure the reference standard’s validity and standardized assessment.

Characteristic Description
Reference Standard Validity The reference standard should accurately classify the target condition. If it’s flawed or biased, it can greatly affect the index test’s accuracy.
Interpretation of Results Interpreting reference standard results can be biased if the evaluators know the index test results. It’s important to keep this risk low.
Challenges in Determination Finding the right reference standard is hard, especially without a perfect test or when the standard has errors.

“The assessment of risk of bias focuses on the validity of individual study results, while applicability considers how findings from a primary study apply to the review question.”4

By tackling the challenges in assessing the reference standard and ensuring its validity, researchers can improve the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. This makes the standardized assessment process more reliable410.

Domain 4: Flow and Timing

The flow and timing domain in QUADAS-2 is key for checking study quality. It looks at how patients are handled and when tests are done. It checks if tests and standards are done right and if all patients are included12.

Assessing Derailments in Flow and Timing

Good flow and timing are vital for study validity. Researchers must watch for any problems in these areas. They need to check if tests and standards are done correctly and if all patients are included4.

Strategies to Mitigate Flow and Timing Issues

To fix flow and timing problems, researchers can use several methods. Making sure tests and standards are done at the right time helps. Also, making sure all patients get the same test and that all are included in the study is important11.

By focusing on flow and timing, researchers can make their studies more reliable. This part of QUADAS-2 helps check these important study aspects.

Criteria Assessment
Concerns regarding applicability High if paediatric study participants are selected according to the described intended use in the instructions for use (IFU) for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis11.
Appropriate interval between index tests and reference standard Yes if both samples are taken concurrently or consecutively or during the same participant encounter in an ambulatory setting11.
Study participants receiving the same reference standard Yes, if all participants were tested using a RT-PCR assay11.
Inclusion in analysis No if the number of enrolled participants does not match the total number in the analysis table, with reasons for exclusion reported11.
Independent evaluation for funding/conflicts of interest Yes if authors declare no conflicts of interest and no financial support was provided by industry or other private sources11.

Roles of Quantitative Metrics in QUADAS-2

Quantitative metrics are key in the QUADAS-2 framework for checking diagnostic study quality. They offer a systematic way to judge diagnostic test performance. This is vital for making evidence-based decisions and clinical choices13.

Metrics for Diagnostic Test Accuracy

QUADAS-2 focuses on sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity shows how well a test spots people with a condition. Specificity shows how well it misses those without the condition14. These metrics are crucial for judging study reliability and spotting false results.

Importance of Sensitivity and Specificity

Sensitivity and specificity are key to understanding test accuracy. A sensitive test catches most with the condition, avoiding missed diagnoses. A specific test rules out those without the condition, cutting down on unnecessary tests14.

Interpreting Diagnostic Accuracy Metrics

QUADAS-2 guides in understanding these metrics, considering study quality and applicability. This helps clinicians and researchers grasp the reliability and applicability of test results13. Such a detailed review ensures studies are rigorously evaluated, making their findings reliable for clinical use.

“The systematic review process involves six key steps essential for a thorough review and meta-analysis.”15

Metric Description
Sensitivity Measure of a test’s ability to correctly identify individuals with the target condition.
Specificity Measure of a test’s ability to correctly identify individuals without the target condition.

Challenges in QUADAS-2 Implementation

Using the QUADAS-2 tool for quality checks in studies can be tough for researchers and healthcare workers16. They often face the need for special knowledge in study methods and may disagree on how to use the tool16.

Strategies to Overcome Implementation Challenges

It’s key to give detailed training to those using QUADAS-216. This training should cover what the tool does, why it’s important, and how to use it right. Also, making clear guides and having meetings to agree on things can help make QUADAS-2 more reliable16.

The Importance of Training for Assessors

Good training for QUADAS-2 users is crucial for its proper use16. Without it, they might not understand the tool well, leading to mistakes in study evaluations16. Investing in good training helps users grasp QUADAS-2 better and use it consistently, making reviews more reliable16.

Tool Evaluated Number of Evaluations
PROBAST 3
RoB2 3
ROBINS-I 4
QUADAS-2 3

Research shows 13 tool evaluations met the criteria, with 3 each for PROBAST, RoB2, and QUADAS-2, and 4 for ROBINS-I1617. These studies covered different topics, methods, and users’ backgrounds1617.

Even though these studies offer insights, they have some limits17. It’s important to keep these in mind when using the tools17.

“The importance of proper training cannot be overstated in ensuring consistent and reliable QUADAS-2 assessments.”

In summary, using QUADAS-2 well needs tackling several challenges, like needing special knowledge and possible disagreements16. With thorough training, clear guides, and agreement among users, we can use QUADAS-2 to its fullest in improving study quality16.

Practical Examples of QUADAS-2 Implementation

The QUADAS-2 tool is used in many medical fields to check the quality of studies. It shows how useful it is in looking at different diagnostic methods, from AI to traditional imaging.

Real-world Applications

Researchers have used QUADAS-2 to review studies on many topics. This includes transvaginal ultrasonography for endometriosis18, cholera rapid tests18, and CT/MRI for liver cancer18. These examples show how QUADAS-2 helps ensure studies are reliable and useful.

Case Studies from Various Medical Fields

A review of 50 systematic reviews showed 27 used QUADAS-219. It found big problems, like over 57% of studies had bias in choosing patients19. Other areas like the test, standard, and timing also had issues.

These issues highlight the need for QUADAS-2. It helps spot problems that affect study quality.

Lessons Learned from Implementations

Using QUADAS-2 has taught us a lot about research challenges. It shows the need to avoid bias and make sure studies are representative. It also helps develop better criteria for study quality18.

By using QUADAS-2, researchers can improve healthcare. They help make treatments more accurate and effective.

Future Directions of QUADAS-2

The future of QUADAS-2 looks bright as diagnostic accuracy assessment evolves. A new project, QUADAS-AI, aims to tackle AI diagnostic systems’ unique challenges. It’s designed to evaluate AI diagnostic studies’ quality1.

QUADAS-AI is still in its early stages. A team of about 15 experts from various fields is working on it. They include healthcare professionals, computer scientists, and more1. Their goal is to make the tool better and meet the changing needs of diagnostic accuracy1.

Recent studies have shown how QUADAS-2 is used in AI studies. Out of 50 reviews, 36 checked the quality, and 27 used QUADAS-219. The results highlight the need for better tools to handle new technologies19.

As QUADAS-AI develops, it will likely change how we assess diagnostic studies. It will offer a detailed way to check AI diagnostic systems’ quality. This will help everyone make better decisions, improving patient care and medical diagnostics1.

“The evolving nature of diagnostic accuracy assessment necessitates ongoing refinement of quality assessment tools to keep pace with technological advancements.”

Conclusion: The Significance of QUADAS-2 in Enhancing Medical Research

QUADAS-2 is a key tool for reviewing diagnostic studies3. It helps make medical research more reliable and trustworthy3. This tool helps in evaluating the quality of diagnostic studies, making research more solid.

It helps in creating better systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This strengthens the basis for making clinical decisions.

Summarizing the Key Takeaways

QUADAS-2 has brought many insights to the table19. It shows that many diagnostic studies have high or unclear bias risks19. This highlights the need for careful quality checks to improve research.

Final Thoughts on Improving Diagnostic Studies

As diagnostic tools evolve, so does the need for quality checks like QUADAS-22. The creation of QUADAS-AI shows efforts to keep research quality high in AI studies2.

Encouragement for Wider Use of QUADAS-2

Using QUADAS-2 is key to better medical research and decision-making3. It helps researchers and doctors improve diagnostic accuracy. This leads to better patient care3.

“QUADAS-2 has become an indispensable tool in the arsenal of medical researchers, ensuring the rigor and credibility of diagnostic accuracy studies.”

Discover How Editverse Can Elevate Your Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

At Editverse, we know how important quality assessment is in meta-analyses and systematic reviews. We offer PhD expert services to help researchers use the QUADAS-2 tool effectively20. Our team guides you through the research process, making sure your work meets top standards.

Introduction to Editverse PhD Expert Services

Editverse aims to help researchers create impactful studies. Our PhD experts know many quality assessment tools, like AMSTAR and Jadad Scale20. But we especially value QUADAS-2 for its focus on diagnostic accuracy studies20.

Comprehensive Support for Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews

We support you from start to finish in your meta-analysis or systematic review. We’ll help you use QUADAS-2 to assess study quality and bias20. Our experts also help choose the right statistical methods, like standardized mean difference (SMD)21.

Expert Guidance from Human PhD-Level Professionals

At Editverse, you get support from our PhD-level team. Unlike automated tools, we offer personalized help for your research20. We ensure your work is of the highest quality, advancing evidence-based practice in your field.

Tailored Solutions for Researchers

Every research project is unique, which is why we offer customized solutions. Whether you need help with design, data analysis, or manuscript prep, we’re here to assist20. Our expertise in QUADAS-2 and other tools helps elevate your research quality and impact.

“Editverse’s PhD-level experts have been instrumental in guiding us through the complex process of implementing QUADAS-2 in our systematic review. Their expertise and personalized support have been invaluable in ensuring the rigor and quality of our research.”

– Dr. Sarah Johnson, Researcher

See the difference Editverse can make in your research202122. Contact us today to learn about our tailored solutions and how we can help you reach your research goals.

Key Features of Editverse Services

At Editverse, we know how important quality and methodological quality are in research. We help you from start to finish, making sure your studies are top-notch. Our team of experts ensures your results are accurate and meet the highest standards2.

End-to-End Assistance from Concept to Publication

We cover everything from starting your research to getting it published. We tailor our support to fit your needs, helping you every step of the way2.

Rigorous Quality Assurance for Accurate Results

We focus a lot on quality and methodological quality. We use tools like QUADAS-2 to make sure your studies are reliable1. Our team checks every detail to keep your research at the highest level1.

Personalized Support for Your Unique Research Needs

We understand that every research project is different. That’s why we offer support that’s just for you. We work with you to meet your goals and preferences, helping in any way we can2.

“Editverse’s commitment to quality and attention to detail have been instrumental in the success of our diagnostic accuracy studies. Their personalized support and expertise have truly elevated our research.”

– Dr. Sarah Emerson, Lead Researcher at ABC Medical Institute

Why Choose Editverse?

At Editverse, we have a team with deep knowledge in many research areas. We support all types of studies and systematic reviews23. Our focus on quality is shown in how we use the QUADAS-2 tool2. Researchers around the world trust us for top-notch systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Expertise Across Diverse Research Domains

Our team knows a lot about many research fields, from health to social sciences23. We tackle the unique challenges of each field. This lets us offer solutions that fit our clients’ needs perfectly.

Commitment to Excellence and Precision

Quality and precision are key for us at Editverse. We use the QUADAS-2 tool to check the quality of studies24. Our experts carefully review each study. This ensures our work meets the highest standards.

Trusted by Researchers Worldwide

Researchers worldwide trust us because of our great results. We’ve worked with schools, governments, and companies23. Our clients love our detail, quick responses, and help with publishing.

Choosing Editverse means your research is in good hands. Learn how we can improve your meta-analysis and systematic reviews. Start working towards your publication goals today.

“Editverse’s expertise and attention to detail have been invaluable in helping us navigate the complexities of the publication process. Their commitment to quality and precision has been instrumental in the success of our research projects.”

–Dr. Emily Johnson, Associate Professor of Epidemiology

Get Started Today

To learn more about how Editverse can help with your systematic review or meta-analysis, visit www.editverse.com. Our team is ready to offer personalized consultations and solutions for your research needs24325. Start improving your research with Editverse’s professional support and expertise in evidence synthesis and quality assessment.

Visit www.editverse.com for More Information

Editverse offers comprehensive services to help you with QUADAS-2 implementation and other quality assessment frameworks. Our team of PhD-level experts will guide you through your systematic review or meta-analysis. They ensure rigorous methods and reliable results. Find out how Editverse can enhance your research journey by visiting our website today.

FAQ

What is QUADAS-2?

QUADAS-2 is a tool for evaluating studies on diagnostic accuracy. It has four main areas: how patients are selected, the index test, the reference standard, and the study’s flow and timing.

What is the role of QUADAS-2 in evaluating diagnostic studies?

QUADAS-2 helps check the quality and usefulness of diagnostic studies. It’s especially important in the field of AI diagnostics. It helps ensure studies are well done and useful for making medical decisions.

What are the key benefits of implementing QUADAS-2?

Using QUADAS-2 makes systematic reviews and meta-analyses more reliable. This improves the evidence doctors use to make decisions. It’s good for all medical fields to use it for better research.

How does QUADAS-2 differ from previous versions?

QUADAS-2 is more detailed than before. It focuses on how well studies apply to real-world situations. It also uses numbers to measure how good tests are, like sensitivity and specificity.

What are the four domains of QUADAS-2?

QUADAS-2 looks at four main areas: patient selection, the index test, the reference standard, and the study’s flow and timing. Each area is checked for bias, and the first three are also looked at for how well they apply.

How is QUADAS-2 implemented?

To use QUADAS-2, you go through four steps. First, you summarize your review question. Then, you tailor the tool to your review. Next, you make a flow diagram for the study. Finally, you assess the study’s bias and applicability.

What are the common challenges in QUADAS-2 implementation?

Using QUADAS-2 can be tough. You need to know a lot about study methods and there might be disagreements. To solve these, you can train assessors well, use clear guides, and have meetings to agree on things.

How has QUADAS-2 been applied in various medical fields?

QUADAS-2 is used in many areas, like AI diagnostics. It’s been used to check studies on ultrasound, rapid tests for cholera, and CT/MRI for liver cancer. It shows it’s useful in many diagnostic areas.

What are the future directions for QUADAS-2?

QUADAS-2 might get updated for AI diagnostics (QUADAS-AI). This update will help deal with AI’s unique challenges. It will provide a way to check AI diagnostic studies.

How can Editverse support my systematic review or meta-analysis?

Editverse offers PhD-level help for meta-analyses and systematic reviews. We support using QUADAS-2. Our team guides you from the start to publication, ensuring your review is top-notch.

Source Links

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11447435/
  2. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2024/1/e58202
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC305345/
  4. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy/current/8-assessing-risk-bias
  5. https://methods.cochrane.org/news/quadas-c-optional-risk-bias-tool-cochrane-reviews-diagnostic-test-accuracy-addressing
  6. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-021-01744-z
  7. https://tropmedhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10140638/
  9. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00221/full
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538840/
  11. https://ebm.bmj.com/content/ebmed/27/5/274/DC4/embed/inline-supplementary-material-4.pdf?download=true
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5982207/
  13. https://mmrjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
  14. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012799
  15. https://synapse.koreamed.org/articles/1027052
  16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38670243/
  17. https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/225799653/TomlinsonE2024Common_Proof.pdf
  18. https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-021-00544-y
  20. https://asklib.hsl.unc.edu/faq/366855
  21. https://openmetaanalysis.github.io/methods.html
  22. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/7ee6ce34-5d43-4218-a800-26b594b54bcc
  23. https://editverse.com/assessing-the-reproducibility-of-diagnostic-tests-across-different-laboratories-and-settings/
  24. https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/150681379/QUADAS_C_manuscript_resubmission_2021.08.30.pdf
  25. https://www.guideline.or.kr/newsletter/vol1406/file/RevMan_5_2_User_Guide.pdf
Editverse