Do you know that asthma affects 339 million people worldwide? This huge number shows why we need effective ways for patients to report their health. PROMs help gather details about a patient’s experience. They are crucial for doctors and researchers.
The AC-PROM Tamil, made for asthma control, showed impressive results in a study. It had a 100% response rate and only took 3-4 minutes to finish. This proves well-made PROMs can be quick and effective.
The AC-PROM Tamil found asthma control with a 79% sensitivity and 71% specificity. These results show how PROMs can be very helpful in health care.
We’re going to talk about the best ways to create and test PROMs. It’s a detailed process that starts with inventing questions and goes deep into testing. Each part is vital to make sure these tools are trustworthy and useful. By knowing the best practices, you can help make health care more focused on patients. This will lead to better health results in many areas of medicine.
Key Takeaways
- PROMs are essential tools for capturing patient experiences and outcomes
- Well-designed PROMs can achieve high response rates and quick completion times
- Validation processes ensure the reliability and effectiveness of PROMs
- PROMs development involves multiple steps, including item generation and psychometric testing
- Best practices in PROM design contribute to advancing patient-centered care
Introduction to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are important in healthcare. They let patients share their views on health, life quality, and how they function daily. These tools are vital for patient-centered research, giving us direct feedback on treatment results.
Definition and Importance of PROMs
A PROM is any direct health report from a patient. They are especially needed when we can’t see the results. These measures cover things like pain, how well you move, and how you feel.
Role in Patient-Centered Research
In patient-centered research, PROMs are key. They help doctors and researchers make better choices and check how well care is given. In trials, PROMs help show how new treatments affect patients. They’re also crucial for understanding the effects of and results of treatments for rare diseases.
Regulatory Considerations for PROMs
There are rules for using PROMs in clinical trials and making new products. The FDA and European Medicines Agency have laid out these rules. They’re to make sure patient reports in healthcare research are top-notch and trustworthy.
PROM Type | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
Generic | Measures overall health-related quality of life | EQ-5D |
Disease-specific | Focuses on symptoms of a particular condition | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire |
Electronic (ePRO) | Digital version of PROMs for easier administration | PROMIS |
Conceptual Framework for PROM Development
A framework is key in making good patient-reported outcomes measures. It clearly shows what the measure should check, which helps in the entire process.
Start with a deep dive into research. This research should involve reading up, talking to experts, and getting patient views. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a great guide for this.
Good frameworks show how things are connected. They help in picking what to measure. For instance, a study in Australia highlighted eight main areas for PROMs:
- Rationale
- Setting
- Ethics
- PROM selection
- PROM administration
- Data management
- Statistical methods
- Feedback and reporting
Include many different people when building your framework. In a study, 40 folks from fields like clinic work, patient advocacy, and quality control shared their thoughts. This ensures your framework meets many perspectives.
Framework Phase | Steps Involved |
---|---|
Goal Setting | Define objectives and scope |
Selecting PROs and PROMs | Choose relevant outcomes and measures |
Developing and Testing Indicators | Create and validate quality indicators |
Implementation and Evaluation | Apply PROMs and assess their impact |
Using these steps, you can craft a strong framework. This will boost the quality and meaning of your patient reports.
Developing and Validating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
PROM development is complex but rewarding work. It demands careful planning and flawless execution. Key steps are necessary for creating reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measures.
Item Generation and Selection
In developing PROMs, the journey starts with item generation. This means we make a bunch of questions or statements. They should truly reflect what we want to measure. An eye-opening study showed that while 88% of guidelines gave development steps, 78% missed key parts, like considering the model of measurement.
Psychometric Testing
Testing a PROM psychometrically is key to its reliability and validity. This step shows how well the measure works in real life. Surprisingly, 98% of guidelines offer statistical advice for psychometric testing. Yet, 72% don’t mention ‘responsiveness’, an important factor in testing.
Content Validity Assessment
Content validity makes sure a PROM really measures its intended concept. Patients and experts play a big role here, sharing their insights and reviews. A study used validation workshops with healthcare pros and patients to choose items for 4 new PRO scales.
Guideline Aspect | Percentage |
---|---|
Guidelines with statistical advice | 98% |
Guidelines with PROM development examples | 88% |
Non-comprehensive guidelines | 78% |
Guidelines missing ‘responsiveness’ step | 72% |
Many guidelines aim to help with PROM development, but most lack full coverage. Only three guides considered all 20 necessary steps. Six came close, missing less than 10% of steps. This shows we need more complete guidance to make strong patient-reported measures.
Best Practices in PROM Design
Creating great patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) needs good thought and work. Make your PROMs stand out with these top tips:
- Clarity and relevance of items
- Minimized respondent burden
- Optimized recall periods
- Use of item response theory
- Implementation of computer adaptive testing
To create great PROMs, focus on making questions easy to understand and connected to patients. This makes sure data is accurate. It also helps people finish it faster and with less effort.
The PROMIS initiative gives standardized measures in many health areas. It’s a great guide for making PROMs of high quality, helping everyone from researchers to doctors with useful tools.
Adapting and translating for different cultures is key in using PROMs globally. These steps make sure that the PROMs work well for everyone, no matter the language or culture.
PROM Design Element | Best Practice |
---|---|
Item Generation | Involve patients in the process |
Response Options | Use consistent and appropriate scales |
Recall Period | Choose timeframes relevant to the condition |
Language | Use simple, clear wording |
Format | Ensure accessibility for all users |
By using these tips in PROM design, you create better health measures. They’re effective, easy to use, and helpful for both doctors and researchers.
Incorporating Patient Engagement in PROM Development
Patients are key in developing PROMs. Their involvement leads to more relevant tools that are easy to use. This means the PROMs really reflect what matters to patients.
Importance of Patient Input
Getting patient views is essential for good PROMs. It pinpoints important matters, making the tools more meaningful for users. Research shows PROMs are better when patients help create them.
“Patient-reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare” – Black N, 2013
Methods for Patient Involvement
Patient involvement in PROMs can take different routes:
- Focus groups
- Cognitive interviews
- Patient advisory boards
- Surveys
These methods open the floor for patients to talk about their experiences. They also can give feedback on how PROMs look and what they say.
Challenges and Solutions in Patient Engagement
Engaging patients does pose problems. It’s hard to include many viewpoints and handle different views. To tackle this, researchers can:
- Take systematic steps when involving patients
- Adhere to guidelines such as the SPIRIT-PRO Extension
- Work closely with patient groups
These steps help PROM makers overcome obstacles. They can then make measures that truly focus on patients’ needs.
Aspect | Without Patient Engagement | With Patient Engagement |
---|---|---|
Relevance | May miss important patient concerns | Captures patient-prioritized outcomes |
Usability | Potentially complex or confusing | More user-friendly and accessible |
Validity | Limited patient perspective | Enhanced content validity |
Quality of Life Assessment and Health Measurement Scales
Assessing quality of life is important in healthcare. Patients share their experiences using PROMs. These tools help us understand how people feel about their health.
Studies show why these tools matter:
- A systematic review identified 204 unique scales for quality of life measurement in mental health.
- 72% of these scales have multiple language versions, making them easier to use worldwide.
- Only 8% measure broader well-being beyond health-related quality of life.
In 1995, the World Health Organization started health assessments. This led to using the same quality of life measures around the globe. In 2007, the PROMIS system was created, making progress in the field.
Some well-known health measurement scales are:
- SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey)
- EQ-5D (EuroQol 5-Dimension)
- WHOQOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment)
These scales let doctors see things from the patients’ viewpoint. They help in making better treatment choices. More efforts are ongoing to make these tools more complete and fitting for different cultures.
Clinical Outcome Assessment and Patient Experience Data
Evaluating how well medical treatments work is vital. Clinical outcome assessments help in this task. They show different angles of a patient’s health and well-being.
Types of Clinical Outcome Assessments
There are four types of these assessments:
- Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
- Observer-reported outcomes (ObsROs)
- Clinician-reported outcomes (ClinROs)
- Performance outcomes (PerfOs)
Each type gives important data. They tell about symptoms, functions, and how medication affects lives.
Integrating Patient Experience Data
Patient experience feedback is critical for healthcare quality. The FDA champions the Patient-Focused Drug Development initiative. Companies like Oracle Life Sciences support this effort with research and surveys in many countries.
Regulatory Considerations
The FDA has specific paths for clinical outcome assessments review. One is the CDER COA Qualification Program. The other is advice through drug development programs. It’s key to show these assessments are relevant and reliable.
Incorporating patient feedback and sticking to rules helps. It makes sure clinical assessments match what patients truly need. This, in turn, aids in improving healthcare outcomes.
Stakeholder Involvement in PROM Development and Validation
Bringing together different groups like patients, doctors, researchers, and officials is key in crafting PROMs. These measures are made better when everyone contributes their view. This makes sure the PROMs cover what truly matters and can be used well.
The ISOQOL offers steps for getting stakeholders together in making PROMs. This helps make the process move smoother and use their inputs best. By sticking to these steps, your PROMs will show what patients really go through and meet medical needs.
Recent findings underline why involving all these groups is crucial when making PROMs:
- A study by Amini et al. (2021) found what helps and what blocks using PROMs in healthcare at a university.
- Rutherford et al. (2021) checked how well PROMs were put to use in New South Wales, Australia, using different methods.
- Van Egdom et al. (2019) talked about using PROMs in treating breast cancer, focusing on care that’s based on results.
Getting people involved also makes the PROM checking process better. In a study, 425 people with bone and muscle pain looked at how good a new PROM was. They worked together and picked 10 issues to watch. This makes the measure much more accurate and useful.
By working with everyone, from start to finish, the measures we create are top-notch and matter a lot to those they serve.
Conclusion
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key in healthcare today. They help in research and how care is given. The TTH-PRO scale for people with tension headaches is a great example. With tension headaches affecting so many adults, these tools are very important.
PROM best practices include using solid statistical methods and getting patients involved. The TTH-PRO scale was made in three steps, with lots of analysis. In the future, we’ll see PROMs mix even more with actual care, using new tech.
Improving how PROMs are made and checked is ongoing work. This work looks at things like missing data, and making sure PROMs work in the real world. By following top standards and being open to new ways, PROMs will keep bettering patient care and research.
FAQ
What are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)?
Why are PROMs important in patient-centered research?
What is a conceptual framework in PROM development?
What are the steps involved in developing and validating PROMs?
What are some best practices in PROM design?
Why is patient engagement important in PROM development?
What are some examples of quality of life (QoL) measures?
What are the different types of clinical outcome assessments?
Why is stakeholder involvement important in PROM development and validation?
Source Links
- https://bmcpulmmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12890-021-01665-6 – Development and validation of a set of patient reported outcome measures to assess effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis – BMC Pulmonary Medicine
- https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/633454/Analytic-Principles-for-Patient-Reported-Outcome-Measures.pdf – Analytic principles for patient-reported outcome measures
- https://www.bcpcm.ca/hubfs/Pathways A guide for developing culturally safe and appropriate patient‐reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) with Indigenous peoples.pdf – Pathways: A guide for developing culturally safe and appropriate patient‐reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) with Indigenous peoples
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4089835/ – Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
- https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2/chapter-18 – Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes
- https://www.qualitymetric.com/about/news/an-in-depth-guide-to-patient-reported-outcome-measures-qualitymetric/ – An In-Depth Guide to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures | QualityMetric
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911317/ – Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
- https://jpro.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9 – Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures – Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e034154 – Mixed methods study to develop the content validity and the conceptual framework of the electronic patient-reported outcome measure for vascular conditions
- https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2024/05/23/bmjebm-2023-112681 – Guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
- https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-open-respiratory-archives-11-articulo-development-validation-patient-reported-outcome-measures-S2659663621000515 – Development and Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) in Home Respiratory Therapies: Oxygen Therapy, CPAP Treatment, Mechanical Ventilation, and Aerosol Therapy
- https://ard.bmj.com/content/81/4/507 – Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for systemic sclerosis: the EULAR Systemic Sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) questionnaire
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157705/ – Saving time and effort: Best practice for adapting existing patient-reported outcome measures in hepatology
- https://mmshub.cms.gov/sites/default/files/Patient-Reported-Outcome-Measures.pdf – Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753201/ – Developing a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369118/ – Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition‐specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217930/ – Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures: a scoping review
- https://jpro.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8 – An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) – Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046758/ – Patient-reported outcome measures suitable for quality of life/well-being assessment in multisectoral, multinational and multiperson mental health economic evaluations
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140508/ – Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11255-023-03702-1 – Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome scale for chronic kidney disease – International Urology and Nephrology
- https://www.oracle.com/life-sciences/real-world-evidence/clinical-outcomes-assessment-development/ – Life Sciences Solutions
- https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/clinical-outcome-assessment-coa-frequently-asked-questions – Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA):FAQs
- https://www.parexel.com/insights/report/patient-focused-drug-development/integrated-development/unmet-needs-patient-relevant-clinical-outcome-assessments-can-provide-strong-evidence – Patient-Relevant Clinical Outcome Assessments | Parexel
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689349/ – Protocol: Protocol for the development and validation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for people with hearing loss: the PREM-HeLP
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699630/ – The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review
- https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124557 – Development and Validation of the Keele Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure (MSK-PROM)
- https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.693553/full – Frontiers | Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Tension-Type Headache
- https://www.fda.gov/media/77832/download – Guidance for Industry
- https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-9-86 – Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science – BMC Medicine