Field-Specific H-Index Requirements
Understand how H-index benchmarks vary across different academic disciplines and what's considered a strong score in your field.
Read MoreExpert systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and high-impact publications that boost your citations by 3-10x. PhD-level expertise, rigorous methodology, global reach.
Rigorous methodology meets expert execution
PRISMA-compliant, Cochrane methodology
Forest plots, heterogeneity analysis, RevMan/STATA
Multiple treatment comparisons, ranking analysis
High-impact journals, citation-optimized
Trusted by 500+ researchers worldwide
Medicine • Life Sciences • Social Sciences • EngineeringYour H-index is a key measure of academic impact. Learn what it means, why it matters, and how to strategically increase it through evidence synthesis publications.
The H-index, proposed by physicist Jorge Hirsch in 2005, measures both the productivity and citation impact of a researcher's publications. It provides a single number that captures research output quality.
H = number of papers with ≥ H citations
A researcher with an H-index of 25 has 25 papers that have each been cited at least 25 times.Unlike simple publication counts or total citations, the H-index balances quantity with quality—you need both many papers AND substantial citations to achieve a high score.
In today's competitive academic environment, your H-index serves as a shorthand for your research impact. Decision-makers use it to evaluate your scholarly contributions across multiple contexts.
Note: H-index expectations vary significantly by field. A medical researcher might have H=40 while an equally accomplished mathematician has H=15. Context matters.
Your H-index can vary depending on which database you use, as each indexes different journals and tracks citations differently. Here's how to check yours:
Pro tip: When reporting your H-index, always specify the source (e.g., "H-index: 18 (Scopus, January 2025)") as values differ between databases.
Growing your H-index requires strategic planning, not just more publications. Focus on high-impact work that attracts sustained citations.
SR and meta-analyses receive 2-5× more citations than primary research in most fields.
Papers in top-quartile journals accumulate citations faster and longer.
Multi-institutional papers have wider reach and higher citation rates.
Open access papers receive 18-42% more citations on average.
Share on ResearchGate, X/Twitter, and present at conferences.
Comprehensive reviews become go-to references cited for years.
Key insight: One high-quality systematic review can contribute more to your H-index than 5 lower-impact primary research papers.
At Editverse, we help researchers accelerate their H-index growth through expert-assisted systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence synthesis publications.
Ready to accelerate your H-index growth with expert-assisted systematic reviews?
Explore Our ServicesComprehensive bundles designed to maximize your publication output, citation impact, and academic visibility across all channels.
Perfect for PhD students and early-career researchers seeking their first high-impact review publication.
Multi-channel publication strategy with SR, meta-analysis, plus visibility across academic and social platforms.
Complete academic brand transformation with NMA, multiple publications, and full media campaign.
95% Acceptance Rate — All packages include revision support until publication
Our streamlined process ensures quality, transparency, and timely delivery at every stage of your systematic review project.
Schedule a call with our research team to discuss your project goals, target journals, and timeline. We'll assess your research question and recommend the optimal approach.
30-45 minutesWe develop a PRISMA-compliant protocol including PICO framework, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and search strategy. Assistance with PROSPERO registration included.
1-2 weeksComprehensive literature search across multiple databases, dual-reviewer screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and meta-analysis with forest plots and subgroup analyses.
6-12 weeksComplete journal-ready manuscript including Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. All tables, figures, and supplementary materials formatted to your target journal's guidelines.
2-4 weeksTarget journal recommendations based on your research area, cover letter drafting, and revision support to address reviewer comments. We're with you until acceptance.
OngoingReady to start your systematic review journey?
Schedule Free ConsultationWe combine methodological rigor with practical publication expertise to deliver results that advance your career.
Your project is led by researchers with doctoral degrees and extensive publication experience in systematic review methodology.
Every systematic review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines and Cochrane methodology standards, ensuring acceptance at top journals.
Meta-analyses performed using RevMan, STATA, and R with proper heterogeneity assessment, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias tests.
Clear milestones and transparent timelines. We deliver when we promise, with regular progress updates throughout your project.
Journal-formatted manuscripts with all figures, tables, PRISMA flow diagrams, and supplementary materials ready for submission.
We don't disappear after delivery. Revision rounds are included to address reviewer comments and ensure acceptance.
Real results from researchers who accelerated their academic impact through our systematic review and meta-analysis services.
"Started with limited international visibility. Now cited by researchers across 15 countries. The systematic reviews opened doors to international collaborations."
"The review articles helped establish my expertise in renewable energy. I've since been invited to editorial boards and international conferences."
"The network meta-analysis was cited in clinical guidelines within a year. A game-changer for my reputation in oncology research."
"As a fresh PhD, I needed publications fast. The two systematic reviews helped me secure a postdoc position at a top European university."
"The meta-analysis became the most-cited paper in my portfolio. It's now required reading in several public health courses."
"The systematic reviews helped me meet promotion requirements ahead of schedule. The quality was exceptional—accepted without major revisions."
Note: Results vary based on research field, publication strategy, and citation patterns in your discipline. All case studies represent anonymized client outcomes.
Learn how to boost your citations and academic impact with our expert guides on systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and research metrics.
Understand how H-index benchmarks vary across different academic disciplines and what's considered a strong score in your field.
Read MoreMaster the PRISMA flow diagram with our step-by-step guide covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion phases.
Read MoreLearn how to register your systematic review protocol on PROSPERO with our comprehensive guide covering requirements and best practices.
Read MoreCompare different reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and learn which one is right for your research methodology.
Read MoreCompare the two leading citation databases to understand their coverage, features, and which one to use for your research metrics.
Read MoreLearn when to use PubMed versus Google Scholar for your literature searches and how to maximize results from each platform.
Read MoreDiscover rejection rates across academic disciplines and strategies to improve your acceptance chances at top journals.
Read MoreUnderstand the differences between Web of Science indices and what each means for your publication strategy and career.
Read MoreGet answers to common questions about our systematic review and H-index improvement services.
The H-index measures both the productivity and citation impact of a researcher's publications. An H-index of N means you have N papers each cited at least N times. It matters because it's widely used for tenure decisions, grant applications, hiring committees, and visa applications (such as the O-1 visa). A higher H-index signals greater academic influence in your field.
Timeline depends on scope and complexity. A scoping or narrative review typically takes 6-10 weeks. A full PRISMA-compliant systematic review with meta-analysis requires 12-16 weeks. Complex projects involving network meta-analysis may take 16-24 weeks. We provide detailed timelines during your free consultation based on your specific research question.
Our comprehensive service includes: PRISMA-compliant protocol development, PROSPERO registration assistance (for Professional and above), comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, dual-reviewer screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, narrative synthesis or meta-analysis, complete manuscript writing, all figures and tables, and revision support for reviewer comments.
We guarantee submission-ready quality that meets journal standards—our acceptance rate is 95%. However, final acceptance depends on journal editorial decisions, reviewer feedback, and factors beyond our control. We include revision support in our packages to address reviewer comments and maximize acceptance likelihood.
A systematic review is a comprehensive, methodical approach to identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing all relevant research on a topic. A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that combines quantitative results from multiple studies to produce a pooled effect estimate. Not all systematic reviews include meta-analysis—it's only appropriate when studies are sufficiently similar to combine statistically.
Yes, revision support is included in all our packages. The Starter Bundle includes minor revisions, Professional includes one full revision round, and Advanced includes two revision rounds. We help you craft point-by-point responses to reviewer comments and make necessary manuscript changes to address their concerns.
We use industry-standard software including Review Manager (RevMan) for Cochrane-style reviews, STATA for advanced meta-analyses, R packages (meta, metafor, netmeta) for network meta-analysis, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) where appropriate. Software choice depends on your analysis needs and target journal preferences.
We follow the PRISMA 2020 statement rigorously. This includes pre-registered protocols, complete documentation of search strategies, dual-reviewer screening with conflict resolution, standardized data extraction forms, appropriate risk of bias tools, and PRISMA flow diagrams. We provide the completed PRISMA checklist with your manuscript for journal submission.
Absolutely. Many of our clients are PhD students looking to build their publication record. Our Starter Bundle is particularly popular with graduate students—it's designed to be affordable while still delivering publication-quality output. We also offer payment plans for students who need flexibility.
We use milestone-based payments with satisfaction checkpoints. You approve each phase before we proceed, ensuring you're happy with progress. If we fail to deliver agreed-upon milestones to professional standards, you're eligible for a refund of that phase. Full details are provided in your project agreement before you commit.
Still have questions? Our research team is happy to help.
Contact UsSchedule a free consultation with our research team. We'll discuss your goals, recommend the best approach, and provide a detailed project proposal.